Changing Rollers on Moving Belt Conveyor

Posted in: , on 6. May. 2009 - 02:33
Quote Originally Posted by Graham ShorttView Post
Well said, Larry. It is interesting that the original difficulty we had in South Africa with these idlers was based on the fact that we were loading hard rock in lumps of +200 mm, hence the rapid failure. It is also interesting that yodieszoy noted that his experience is in the fertilizer industry, where the material is generally reasonably granular.

Yodieszoy also said the following, which is far more chilling : "Another point to stand out is the self-cleaning effect, I don’t have to stop the conveyor and send a man to clean the debris now and then. I do not need to stop the conveyor to change an idler either, we can do it in seconds while the conveyors carry on working." There is absiolutely no way you should be allowed to, or allow any one else work on a moving conveyor. In order to change an idler - any idler - or in fact work on the conveyor in any way, it is absolutely essential that the system be locked out and tagged BEFORE any work is carried out .

Incidentally, Briec, since you started this whole thread, have you managed to source Limberollers and if so, how have they behaved?

Graham Shortt

Hi Graham,

You are totally correct in your comments as they relate to the existing belt conveyor systems. However, Technology is being innovation in progress.

There is a new Conveyor Idler Assembly that allows rolls to be changed while the belt is running. This Assembly allows the whole maintenance procedure to be completed by one person working from any side walkway without entering any part of the body into the hazardous areas of the belt conveyor, ie:- inside the stringers. Every action is done outside the hazardous workings. I will have met the new most stringent proposed Australian Standards whereby the new 'Standards' are that the whole sides of the conveyor will be guarded. With my patented design, we can remove one or any roll from the assembly, when it is lowered during the maintenance procedure, and we are working on a non rotating rolls in the 'Cassette' system which is accessible directly under the stringer. Rolls on the opposite side are retracted like a sausage of inter-latched 'Cassettes' so pulling the first roll draws the remaining rolls to the end of the assembly and the rolls are changed in the 'Cassette' in the safety of the walkway. The Conveyor Idler Assembly, CIA for short, has been designated as DunnEasy Idler. If you would like a copy of the maintenance procedure in .ppt format, please download or email me directly and I will send you the broachure.

http://www.tamecservices.com.au.

Les Dunn

PS:- I have also patent applied for a conveyor idler roll which is Stub Axle Technology 'Onefits Roll' and the rolls are shaft-less internally but have the bearing capability of 6411 of the largest roll in the CEMA range and this complex bearing is also used down to the smallest Cema B range of 76mm (3"). These rolls are in testing prior to full supply to the industry. 35% lighter @ 500mm shell length to 90% lighter @ 2200mm length. I will keep everyone informed as the testing progresses and is completed. Some of the major manufacturers will be putting the rolls into their testing facilities in a few weeks.

Mechanical Doctor There is No such thing as a PROBLEM, just an ISSUE requiring a SOLUTION email:- [email]tecmate@bigpond.com[/email] Patented conveyor Products DunnEasy Idler Assembly & Onefits conveyor Idler Roll [WINNER] Australian Broadcasters Corporation's TV 'The New Inventors' Episode 25 - 27th July 2011 [url]http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s3275906.htm[/url]

Re: Changing Rollers On Moving Belt Conveyor

Posted on 6. May. 2009 - 10:24

Les,

Why not put the quick change idler up in it's own thread?

That way we can bang our heads together about issues of overall safety concerns & the cost effectiveness of that idler system versus eg. a robot idler changer.

Has the Oz Standard for total guarding really been thought through? Rabbit Proof Fence springs to mind.

Re: Changing Rollers On Moving Belt Conveyor

Posted on 18. May. 2009 - 03:12

Les

Interesting indeed. I moved this to its own thread as the thread you posted it in was about 4 years old.

Here we can can have a much more detailed discussion as louispanjang has suggested.

Gary

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

Re: Changing Rollers On Moving Belt Conveyor

Posted on 18. May. 2009 - 03:52

Let's go then:

Is the Rabbit Proof Fence fitted in place of pull wires, or lanyards (for our Perth colleagues)?

Can the conveyor working be examined through guards? Can it be even be expected to be observed? Out of sight & out of mind....well certainly out of sight anyway.

Existing regulations in most parts of the known world require the hazardous machine to be interlocked with the guards. If you take a guard off then the hazardous machine has to stop anyway. What's the point of the guard otherwise? So if the machine is stopped it is then possible to change the normal idlers on a now stationary conveyor...or am I missing something?

Whichever way the water goes down the plughole it is still going round in circles.

Proposed New Australian Conveyor Standards

Posted on 19. May. 2009 - 02:32

Hi All. Thank you for this as I was a bit unsure how to go about starting a new thread. The guarding from my interpretation is that it will all be interlocked and see through [mesh or clear laminate] which will cause undue buildup on the insides. As anyone who works with conveyors know, the fine dusts and spilt products can and do buildup in a vertical face if housekeeping is not maintained. The Lanyards have to remain for safety reasons as per normal outside the side guards for normal insitu hazards that occur. With my product, the DunnEasy J Plate acts as a small guard to close the aperture in the side guards and maintains the cover even when the DunnEasy is lowered for roll replacement. This need not be interlocked with the guarding as there is no aperture to get your hands through and the rolls become inactive when the assembly is lowered. The nearest pinch point would be more than a metre away at the next idler station if you could get your arm through the side guards. I will also start another thread shortly as I have a new patented product that I have worked on for more than 23 years to perfect which is a roll head that 2 are used to create a roll without a through shaft which reduces the mass by 30% for a 535mm long 152mm (6") roll and up to 90% for a 2200mm long roll. It has one complex bearing of my design that has the carry and axial loadings in excess of 93Kn for catenary or single end mounting using only one head in the shell with the other blanked. The first in test has a rim drag of less than 0.44N which is far below any manufacturers that I have used previously. These preliminary tests indicate my expectations have been exceeded. I will keep you informed as I progress and I have a number going into testing for the major mining company for their world supply. Cannot mention names as this would be unethical.

Attachments

100_1514 (JPG)

100_1515 (JPG)

Mechanical Doctor There is No such thing as a PROBLEM, just an ISSUE requiring a SOLUTION email:- [email]tecmate@bigpond.com[/email] Patented conveyor Products DunnEasy Idler Assembly & Onefits conveyor Idler Roll [WINNER] Australian Broadcasters Corporation's TV 'The New Inventors' Episode 25 - 27th July 2011 [url]http://www.abc.net.au/tv/newinventors/txt/s3275906.htm[/url]