Skirting Design

Posted in: , on 3. Apr. 2009 - 06:01

Dear Forum,

Our Plant is coal mining, We have conveyor with 1.8m belt width, Speed 8.4m/s with and 4500TPH and it has several loading pints (6) each loading point come from Vibrating feeder with capacity 1200TPH each. the vibrating feeder just only approx 2M height from the belt surface.

We have suffering problem with belt damaged especially entrapment material under the skirt plate.

If there are any member having similar problem with this, I Hope could share or maybe has way out.

Thanks

ANC

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 3. Apr. 2009 - 07:41

Skirting receiving feed from downstream must always be set in relief. Meaning the leading edge is closer to the belt than the trailing edge. If this is reverse you are asking for trouble with trapped material.

Flaring the inlet to the skirt is also advisable to prevent plowing off of product at the inlet to the skirt.

Here is a typical design that we use.

Attachments

skirt (PDF)

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 4. Apr. 2009 - 02:29

Thanks a lot Mr.Gary.

Is there any suggestion for skirting installed at reversible conveyors ?

Regards,

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 5. Apr. 2009 - 07:24

To hope to prevent spillage with multiple loading points you must provide full length skirts along the whole loading length. Like the books say! It is pointless to accept the spreading of burden & subsequently try to regather the material with profiled skirts.

Why?

Because the energy expended in lifting the spread material & pushing it sideways is repeated at every subsequent material addition, grows accordingly & places additional load on the sealing rubber. Never mind the entrapment issue.

If you want to reverse a belt under multiple loading points you must simply provide skirts along the full loading length, as before.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 5. Apr. 2009 - 10:13

full length skirt will require a much closer look at the HP required to over come the friction generated by the skirting material.

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 5. Apr. 2009 - 10:53
Quote Originally Posted by Gary BlenkhornView Post
full length skirt will require a much closer look at the HP required to over come the friction generated by the skirting material.

I must agree with this statement based on bitter experience!

Best to try and set up a test to measure the skirt friction than rely on figures in a book.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 7. Apr. 2009 - 06:25

In one of our conveyors the distance between two feeding points is more than 50 metres.

We may need a better solution.

Regards,

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 9. Apr. 2009 - 10:20

Thanks for all suggestions, I'm agrree with prolong skirt must check the friction and HP first, at our skirt we already made widder at the leading edge but we still has problem at trailling edge.

but it still having entrapment under skirt, sorry for firs information our conveyor has 8.4m/s speed and 1.2m belt width.

with that speed prolong the skirt is to risk with the belt due to entrapment material and it could raise the friction and Power.

the entrapment material mostly come from the last skirt if conveyor has full load from the previous loading point.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 9. Apr. 2009 - 10:27

and several books says that to maintain gap under the skirt plate could reduce the entrapment materidal by made inclide from 1/4" to 3/8" at the trailling edge along the skirt.

we still under process but if there any other suggestion from the forum it would be better.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 9. Apr. 2009 - 08:28

My observation is that your plant has a conveyor fed by 6 feeders with a gap of 50m between & now, eventually, it has been decided to look at the skirting issue. It's a bit overdue!! Who was responsible for design checking? Your belt will be a lifetime source of trouble & I anticipate more thrilling episodes.

You need full length skirts & that's it. You say that full length skirts will damage the belt due to entrapment. not true, skirts are supposed to stop entrapment, which you already have. You admit that flaring the local skirts does not prevent entrapment (it actually increases entrapment) but you are reluctant to do the job properly. Obviously more thought should have gone into loading a belt travelling at 8.4 m/s at 6 places with 50m gaps.

Re: Skirting Design

Posted on 10. Apr. 2009 - 05:10

For the multiple location of receiving chutes, can we use different angles of troughing frames?

For example, the troughing angle of carrying frames may be 45 degrees below the receiving chutes, but at other places it can be 35 degrees. Will it cause any significant ill effects on the conveyor belt?

Regards,