Compressor control strategy

Posted in: , on 30. Oct. 2006 - 15:23

The topic I am involved with is the basic comparison between control methods of an oil free air screw compressor.

We are considering two options:

a) Oil free screw compressor with VSD

b) Oil free compressor without VSD but with adequate buffer tank which will allow on/off operation of the compressor while guarateeing acceptable number of starting per hour.

Consideration:

While a compressor equipped with VSD is said to adjust the air delivery to changing demand I wonder about the overall energy efficiency at varying capacities. It is understood and accepted that the compressor has a limit on the amount of turn down however, one manufacturer declares that "the efficiency remains 95% thrughout the turn down range" .

We know that an oil free screw compressor has an internal leakage that, for a given P2/P1 ratio (P1 inlet pressure, P2 outlet pressure), is practically constant.

If we define Etta volumetric as (air volume inlet- internal leakage)/air volume inlet, we get

Etta= 1- leakage/inlet volume

Since internal leakage is almost constant it follows that Etta is decreasing as inlet volume decreases or, in other words, with

increasing turn down.

This result does not agree with the manufacturer statement as mentioned above.

It is true that the manufacturer did not specify which efficiency he was refering to and I assumed it was volumetric efficiency.

Another manufacturer says that the power and capacity change proportionately with turn down but says nothing about efficiency.

My problem is the following:

Should we select a screw compressor with VSD and in such case how will the overall energy efficiency change with turn down? or, should we select a screw compressor with the best overall efficiency at the full load point and use a properly sized buffer tank to allow for a reasonable on/off control.

2. Reliabilty

One manufacturer suggests a compressor with VSD where the motor is not the regular squirel cage type but, rather, Hybrid Permanent Magnet.

Can anyone comment on this type of electrical motor?

Thank you,

Dror.

Compressor Search

Erstellt am 30. Oct. 2006 - 04:34

Greetings from the soon to be frozen "Eastern Wilderness" @1140 feet above mean sea level.

The rule of thumb for any type of machinery is that the dumber it is the easier it is to take care of, repair, and trouble shoot problems.

You can buy a lot of buffer tankage set up in series or parallel storage for your intended use.

You will just have to be sure to drain the tanks every day of air to remove all the accumulated moisture otherwise you will lose compressed air capacity.

We managed very well with an old Joy radial piston air compressors with a Square D pressure switches and large buffer tanks that shut off when not needed for the work load.

Perhaps you should look at the radial piston air compressors used by Electro Motive and General Electric in their locomotives,

as they operate for millions of cycles and are proven units that have been in use for most of the last century.

Assuming you have three phase power the motor size needed will be dependent on the maximum rpm via v belts and v belt pulleys.

I am unsure as to who is the manufacturer but a phone call to either locomotive builder or googleing locomotive air compressors will solve that mystery:^)

lzaharis

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 30. Oct. 2006 - 05:21

Good day Mr dror,

The application of an oil free screw compressor with or without a variable speed drive (VSD) is just calculating and comparing the performance of both options.

This calculation will show the range of speed control, the starting currents, the starting time, the necessity of a no-load starting device, resulting exhaust temperatures at various speeds and loads, the size of a buffer tank, etc.

Also the application is important, f.i. in pneumatic conveying it is in most cases sufficient to have a constant air delivery.

If you inform us of the relevant data, you have so far, we might be able to help you further.

best regards

teus

Teus

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 30. Oct. 2006 - 06:26

Dear Teus,

Usually before selecting a piece of equipment say, a centrifugal pump, we would check the characteristic curve, determine the working point and consider hydraulic efficiency etc. When we consider compressors I feel that manufacturers leave a lot behind the scene and try to convince us with a lot of sales talk and minimal hard engineering.

Yes we would like to get steady preasure at the consumer (who does not). The application is providing breathing air to a varying number of operators through special air masks. There will be a purification apparatus downstream from the compressor which may result in some pressure loss and, obviously, some pressure allowance should be considered for the distribution system. All these topics are recognized and will get proper attention.

So as you see my problem is how to determine the overall power demand of a VSD based compressor in varying capacities against a single speed compressor for which all parameters are known.

Is it possible that a VSD based oil free screw compressor retains a 95% efficiency within the entire turn down range? I raised my doubt due to the internal leakage as shown in my original mail.

Finally, any knowledge/experience regarding Hybrid Permanent Magnet motor?

Thanks your consideration,

Dror.

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 30. Oct. 2006 - 07:23

dear Dror,

I doubt, whether a screw compressor can have a speed range from 0% to 100% without problems.

The volumetric efficiency at very low speeds will go to 0%, increasing the outlet temperature, and the (forced) lubrication will have failed before that.

The cooling of the electric motor is also a concern.

If you can supply the required maximum volume and the required constant pressure, I can make the approximate screw compressor curves you need.

At the same time I calculate the performance curves for a lobe blower (Roots type)

I do not have experience with Hybrid Permanent Magnet motor. It seems an expensive piece of equipment to me. Manufacturers should be able to explain the advantages.

let me know

teus

Teus

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 31. Oct. 2006 - 06:30

Dear Teus,

The VSD based system will have turn down range of 100%-50% of rated capacity. Below 50% it will shut down much like an on/off system. In order to prevent frequent cycling a properly sized buffer tank will be required. In such case a question comes to mind what is the benefit of the VSD system except for capacity flexibility within the turn down range and since we know that the volumetric efficiency decreases with increasing turn down what penalty (energy) do we pay for this flexibility?

This, in fact, is my main question.

Dror.

Compressor

Erstellt am 31. Oct. 2006 - 01:57

Dror,

your purpose is much better served if you bottle your own

breathing air or purchase it from a gas distributor in large

volumes as the economies for it out weigh the cost of an oil free

screw compressor, buffer tanks, and many regulators versus one

large storage tank and regulator for the entire system and feed it

through a manifold to your crew-I am assuming you are spray

painting.

This simplifies the whole process as much less money is spent on

physical plant and breathing air purity-the case in point is

breathing air bottled for fire fighters and scuba divers.

Many fire trucks built for rescue work have on board

compressors to bottle their breathing airand have been used

for many years.

You will save a considerable amount of funds for your purpose as

it is purpose specific and designed specifically for the task at

hand and you will avoid the potential health problems from oil

mists in breathing air streams.

The local fire truck distributor and or the local bottled gas

suppier/distributor BOC or Linde in your area will be able to help

you with this.

With manifold distribution of bottled gasses flow is guaranteed

at low pressure -breathing air pressure at 1 atmospere Hg. and

purity is gauranteed plus moisture is eliminated in the process.

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 31. Oct. 2006 - 05:53

Izaharis,

The application is not paint spraying but, rather, supplying breathing air to dry processing areas in a pharmaceutical plant. We need to consider many points of operation, therefore, a central air compression and purification is preferred.

Thank you for your consideration.

Dror.

Compressor

Erstellt am 31. Oct. 2006 - 09:57

Dror,

If you are setting up multiple work stations you are going to be using parker or Aeroquip compressed air male/female connectors with full face apparatus this will be even easier as the load for breathing air will be very low since you are working at sea level you cannot push more than 14.28 psi through the entire system and you will be required to use stainless steel anyway to maintain breathing air quality.

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 1. Dec. 2006 - 05:52

Izaharis

Thanks your advise.

Dror.

Hpm & Part Load Efficiency

Erstellt am 9. Feb. 2008 - 10:43

Dror,

The option of having a bigger receiver in you plant to take care of any sort of fluctuation or to cater the plant air demand when compressor goes to a unload in practically not viable since for 100CFM demand you would require a 20M^3 (Approx) Air receiver so that the pressure drop inside the air receiver is not more than 0.5 kg/cm^2G

Further the compressor that you are evaluating comes with HPM motor as a standard supply from the manufacturer. You are absolutely right that in VFD compressor at part loads the compressor efficiency dips i.e because the motor efficiency goes down drastically when it is made to run at RPM lower than the RAted RPM of the motor. In case of HPM Motor this efficiency drop due to reduced RPM is minimum in fact the difference between minimum and the maximum efficiency is hary 5 to 6 % hence at part loads these kind of motors are more efficient than the normal induction motor.

Further in HPM Motor any size there is not restriction of start and stops that the motor can take per hour hence they are designed to take part load as well as frequent on/off situation with out even allowing the machine to unload.

One point you should remember that Rotary screw compressor are best used when they are at full load as far as possible Unloading condition should be avoided that is the reason why VFD is required bassically to avoid unloading in the compressor.

Hope this is in line with your requirements

Best Regards

Abhineet Choudhary +919739047939

Re: Compressor Control Strategy

Erstellt am 12. Feb. 2008 - 03:43

Hello Dror,

before we get our Unterhosen all bunched up over efficiency it is necessary to review the pressure in conjunction with the flow you need. I doubt that a buffer tank will help you, if you are talking about a oil free single stage screw compressor with a maximum of 3.5BarG pressure.

Instrument air usually means a pressure of 8-10BarG. That would be a twin oil free rotary screw compressor. If your system already exists, I would contact your two compressor manufacturers and ask for an "air audit". Sucg audits reveal the snap shot of how much air (even leakage rates) you really need and you usually get a recommendation as to how to proceed with and without a buffer tank.

My personal inclination is to always go with a VFD as they provide with the maximum of flexibility - they is nothing worse than wasting HP by compressing to a higher pressure than you need and for accruing unneccary idle run time.

Permanent magnet motors are something relatively new, but the techniology is sound. They are harder to replace and repair. Standard customary squirrel cage motors can be acquired and fixed easier.

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]