Coal import terminals

Jeroen Staneke
(not verified)
Posted in: , on 22. Oct. 2004 - 14:34

Dear Mister/Miss,

My name is Jeroen Staneke and I am busy with my diploma thesis for the Technical University in Delft, Holland. The title of my thesis is: Benchmark analysis of import bulk terminals. A part of my assignment is to compare three different lay-outs of an import coal terminal. One with a CSU, one with a Gantry/portal crane and one with a Mobile harbour crane.

Can somebody please tell me what the advantages and disadvantages are of the CSU in comparison with the gantry/portal crane and mobile harbour crane?

Can someone please tell me who are the biggest competitors on the market for unloading coal with gantry cranes and CSU's? For the mobile harbour cranes the biggest competitors are: Gottwald, Liebherr and Reggiane.

I will be very pleased if you are able to help me.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards

Jeroen Staneke

J.S.V.Staneke@student.tudelft.nl

Author
(not verified)

Coal Import Terminals

Erstellt am 22. Oct. 2004 - 01:00

I suggest you check the eLibrary for articles published in "bulk solids handling". You will find dozens of papers worth reading!

The TU Delt is a subscriber to "bulk solids handling".

I wish you a high degree of efficiency.

Reinhard Wohlbier

Analysis Of Import Bulk Terminals

Erstellt am 4. Dec. 2004 - 03:38

Dear Mr. Jeroen Staneke ..

My name is Marcelo Alonso, former designer of harbour cranes in a Agentinian company (IMPSA) and actually Project Manager for Cranes and Ports related bussines in ASH Engineering.

Basically your inquire is not easy to answer, all depends if the terminal will be exclusivelly for coal, the production capacity in ton per hour your project needs, the size of ships you will attend at the terminal, and some others particulars.

The main difference between the systems are:



CSU. Reccomended for terminals exclusively used to unload coal. The machine is not reversable, it means the terminal will not export any kind of some other products in the future.

Gantry/portal crane . This equipment was developed basically to handle containers and bulk materials, deppend of the materials and the grab volume the production range can be simmilar to the CSU system. Some terminals not exclusives for coal use it machine because the versatility and easy start up to set up other human consume products or fertilizers.

Mobile harbour crane. This equipment was developed basically to handle bulk materials and containers , deppend of the materials and the grab volume the production range can be simmilar to the CSU system. Some terminals with CSU or portal cranes installed use it machine to improve the production when the berth is long enough to handle both machines on it.

In some projects I know the owners starts unloading with mobile cranes in paralell with the port construction .

All deppends your client / project / company needs.

Gantry Cranes:Nöell, Vulcan Kocks, IPS System, Kone, others.

CSU: Vöest Alpine, Thyssen Group, FAM, others

Mobile: Gottwald, Liebherr, Reggiane, Demag, others

Please do not hesitate to contact for further information.

Marcelo Alonso

malonso@ash.cl

Marcelo A Alonso.
Frenky60
(not verified)

Re: Analysis Of Import Bulk Terminals

Erstellt am 5. Dec. 2004 - 12:00

few more details regarding manufacturer :

Gantry Cranes: Nöell (owned by Reggiane cranes and plants), Vulcan Kocks, IPS System, Kone, OMG, Denicola & others.

CSU: Vöest Alpine, Thyssen Group, FAM, Reggiane Cranes and plants, OMG, Roncuzzi, ZPMC & others

Mobile: Gottwald, Liebherr, Fantuzzi Reggiane, Demag, others

Marcelo Alonso

malonso@ash.cl [/B][/QUOTE]

Jeroen Staneke
(not verified)

More Detailed Information

Erstellt am 17. Dec. 2004 - 10:57

I want to thank you for your replies. Mean while I have some more information about the terminal. The mean capacities of the three unloaders are:

- CSU: 1,800 tph or 3,600 tph (depending on 1 or 2 CSU's)

- Bridge type grab crane: 1,800 tph (gantry or portal crane)

- Mobile habour crane: 1,200 tph

The ship sizes are up to 150,00 DWT this means the outreach of the three different unloaders has to about 35 m.

I am looking for more detailed information on the different unloaders (Sizes, weights and costs) and I have written the manufacturers of these unloaders, but until now I didn't receive any answers back. That is why I am trying to gather information this way.

I really hope someone can help me. Other wise I have problems to finish my thesis.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

Jeroen Staneke

Coal Import Terminal

Erstellt am 17. Dec. 2004 - 01:56

You are welcome,

The efectivity of the different unloader machines is depend of your needs, independ of your projects we have some differences in the productivity listed.

C shall be biger than 4,000 tph otherwise the cost vs productivity in not convinience in comparation with a bridge or level luffing machine.

- Bridge type grab crane: 2,000 tph is a conservative value for your evaluation.

- Mobile habour crane: 700 up to 950 tph all depends your berth facility and load per sqmeter in your soil.

The Outreach absolutelly variable and depend of your needs . It also will impact the cost of the machine.

All the manufacturers want to design few number of models then the Outreach is a problem. Some manufacturers are open to design the machine as per your requires it means more time, more risk and money.

Wider ships can be worked using more moval equipment, in our terminal every 55,000 DWT coal ship demand aditional 250 hs of machines such us buldozers on board wen we have to use a short outreach equipment.

CSU machine 4000 tph cost about 7 milion dollars FOB basis

Gantry Crane 2000 tph cost about 5.5 milion dollars FOB basis

Level Luffing 900 tph cost about 4 milion dollars FOB basis

Moval harbour 700 tph cost about 2,3 milion dollars FOB basis

Important thing to help you is to kwow a litle bit your project .

Best Regards.

MAL.

Marcelo A Alonso.
Jeroen Staneke
(not verified)

Terminal

Erstellt am 17. Dec. 2004 - 02:36

Thank you for your quick response. Below the input parameters of my project are listed. The ships has to be unloaded and a part (which part I don't know yet) has to loaded directly or via ground storage in barges or feeders by the mobile harbour crane or bridge tpye grab crane. for the CSU another loading area will be built. I contacted Gottwald and they say a mean capacity of 1,200 tph for a mobile harbour crane is possible????

•Annual throughput: 5 - 8 million tonnes

•Arriving ship types:

50 x 40.000 DWT

30 x 75.000 DWT

20 x 120.000 DWT

10 x 150.000 DWT

•unloading times

50 hours for a 40.000 DWT ship

60 hours for a 75.000 DWT ship

72 hours for a 120.000 DWT ship

72 hours for a 150.000 DWT ship

•Quay length: 700 m

•Handled materials: coal

•Mean storage time of the material: 1 month

•Working hours: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

•Hinterland transport modes: feeders, barges, trains and trucks

•Partition of the hinterland transport modes:

Feedersabout 1 mio ton

Bargesabout 4 mio ton

Trainsabout 1 mio ton

Trucksabout 2 mio ton

This numbers My professor came up with.

Gottwald Capacity

Erstellt am 17. Dec. 2004 - 11:41

let me give you my impresion about.

first.

The cicle of the machine shall be measured with the hold at maximum, medium and minimum capacity. 1200 can be with full cargo at hold but practically the hold will be going down the level and the production every hour is going down.

the last 6 hours are the worst then those kill your performance.

second.

The coal is about 2,3 kilograms per litre relative weight, if the coal you have is free of humidity it can be 1,7 kg/litre it means that you have grabs about 20 cubic meters, it means 34 tons of coal plus a weight of the grab it is around 12 ton equal to 46 tons holding on the boom structure, with an continuous operation of 72 hours let me tell you that can not believe 1200 tons.

also the weel load in those conditions is too much, how is the berth capacity, are the berth beams located in a dimention according with the original span of the crane?

Also you have consider an enough berth capacity to move the crane all along ?

Tomorrow will give more details.

regards.

MAL

Marcelo A Alonso.

Coal Import Terminal

Erstellt am 18. Dec. 2004 - 09:07

I need some more definitions to help you.

tell me the crane and equipments you have being determine to be use.

The equipment to load barges and to unload ships will be the same?

you have being considered that once you have unloading 150,000 ton ships you have to load barges in paralell?

I think that the best combination will be some 2000 tph crane equipment ( two units) plus some handable and portable conveyors ( 1200 tph)

Think on that and later we discuss.

Marcelo A Alonso.
Jeroen Staneke
(not verified)

Re: Coal Import Terminals

Erstellt am 23. Dec. 2004 - 08:56

Sorry, but I have to bother you again.

For my diploma thesis I need some information about building a new quay wall. it is obvious the quay wall has to be stronger when more weight is on it, but how will this effect the costs or the building procedure?

Can anybody help me with information or a contact?

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

Jeroen Staneke

Re: Coal Import Terminals

Erstellt am 25. Dec. 2004 - 04:32

I´m working on it.. I need some days because now I´m on travel, I will be back on friday.

I will let you know some referencial values.

Regards.

MAL

Marcelo A Alonso.

Re: Coal Import Terminals

Erstellt am 29. Dec. 2004 - 07:03

Jeroen,

I have some budjets for some other projects in Chile (south America) a berth 4oo mts long 35 mts wide two lines of rails span 30 mts 3120 piles is about 14 million dolars.

It can hold a machine with about 20 tons per meter (on rail line).

the rail is 175 lbs/yrd

Chile is very seismic country may be in other places it is cheaper than here.

I will find more details.

Regards.

MAL

Marcelo A Alonso.