Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Posted in: , on 12. Jun. 2004 - 02:46

Hi All,

Has anyone come up with good means/ways in reducing the spillage from the tripper section feeding stackers. The main issue is rocks that start rolling back, gathering pace and rolling off when the material thins/runs out on the belt ie no more material behind to keep the rocks stationery and the tripper belt starts to lift off the idlers/curve?

It causes a lot of spillage esp. when there is intermittent feed up the belt.

Thanks

James Morrish

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 12. Jun. 2004 - 03:56

Dear Mr. Morrish,

1.0) Please inform the belt width, belt speed, material name, material size gradation and tripper inclination for more meaningful reply.

2.0) General solutions are :

2.1) Ensure continuity of flow.

2.2) Use the heavier belt i.e. when you are replacing the belt, opt for the same carcass but with thicker covers. This is a design analysis issue.

2.3) Use of hold down discs on curvature. This minimizes the spillage but does not eliminate the spillage.

2.4) Make the conveyor starting more smooth / gradual, this will enable to reduce the dead tension in the belt and thereby minimize the chances of lift up. This is design analysis issue.

2.5) Modify the tripper zone i.e. make it longer, but this is a major work.

2.6) Review the type of drive/s for minimum tension in the belt.

Regards,

Ishwar G Mulani.

Author of Book : Engineering Science and Application Design for Belt Conveyors.

Advisor / Consultant for Bulk Material Handling System & Issues.

Email : parimul@pn2.vsnl.net.in

Tel.: 0091 (0)20 25882916

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 12. Jun. 2004 - 08:34

Hello Again James,

Spillage can be minimized using curved chutes engineered for the installation.

As much as is written on how to control product flow in transfers, it is still a hard sell for some. Wait one year from now and see the numbers increase around the world. the testimonials such as tripper/stackers will hard to ignore.

LKN

Lawrence Nordell Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. website, email & phone contacts: www.conveyor-dynamics.com nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com phone: USA 360-671-2200 fax: USA 360-671-8450

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 12. Jun. 2004 - 08:45

A specific point on rollback and bad transfer designs:

Flow onto incline stackers is usually through a direct drop. Product hits the belt, from the verticalk fall, with a reverse vector to belt and product flow direction. Rock rotation is initiated as the rock is accelerated to belt velocity. Without adjacent interlocking rocks, the rock can begin to tumble and bounce backward. Spin momentum is increased and rock careens out of control. Belt wear and gouging damage and product spillage are dominant.

Proper chute design brings the rock onto the belt at near belt speed and in the same direction as belt travel. There can be instable instances of the above adverse phenomena, but they are reduced by many multiples. Try it. We guaranty it or no pay.

Lawrence Nordell

Conveyor Dynamics, Inc.

www.conveyor-dynamics.com

Lawrence Nordell Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. website, email & phone contacts: www.conveyor-dynamics.com nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com phone: USA 360-671-2200 fax: USA 360-671-8450

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 13. Jun. 2004 - 08:15

Hi Larry/Ishwar,

Points duly noted....

Extra belt cover is OK for start but as belt wears, weight gets less.

I have heard that a good design is one that will not lift off the tripper idlers under start with 20% burden loading.

Trouble is that we have a existing unti that was upgraded acc. for more tph.

I am looking at get the tension down, revists the curve and hold down rollers, softer start etc.

Can not do much about having continious flow of material..

I have heard of inclined coal conveyors having a fully skirted run to stop ROM coal running back/falling off the belt.

I was thinking of something similar but will have trouble with belt lifting into the skirts.

Larry - your email is about the boom conveyor belt....we have tried curved chutes etc...trying to cut back on belt cover wear but with clay fines etc - had some pretty good blockages in the wet.... The massive amount of material that comes of the top of the chute trips the safety pull wire > hey presto > surrogate blocked chute probe. So we are back to the proven drop it straight onto the belt approach and pay for the belt wear.

Thanks

James

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 13. Jun. 2004 - 06:16

James:

Garabe in yields garbage out. There is a difference in curved chute technology - those with physics and those that suck-it-and-see. We have curved chutes working in clay. Liner materials, their surface finish selection and idealized chute geometry differ between designers. DEM allows material rheology sensitivity analysis to optimized curved shape and liner materials to the variances of product flow properties.

Are you running all clay at times? Western Australia Yandi iron ores have extreme wet fines and large lump clay lenses. The curved hood and spoons are working. There have been hicups with Dua plate and its very poor surface finish and flow interrupting shapes. Design shapes submitted get altered by commitees.

Would you like to have your failed chute evaluated against our alternative?

It is a shame you get the bad apple that spoils the barrel - ancient ineffective engineering tools. We have also learned that too many cooks spoil the broth - optimal design is altered by others.

I can say the same about tripper designs. Designs become compromised in the details:

1. biggest drop in higher tension comes with better rolling efficient rubber

2. use dual drive with best power ratio to minimize counterweight

3. use ceramic lagged drive pulleys to minimiize counterweight

4. place counterweight at tail pulley also requiring optimum soft-start to control belt tension to necessary belt sag level

5. larger idler diameter rolls to bring belt tension & power down

6. idler support optimized to extend belt support at base of curve on moving tripper frame

7. belts wear less with a proper chute design

8. optimized belt speed and width to select best fit for tension in concave curve and total cost of ownership

9. give Dave Beckeley a shout - one of the belt tripper designers in OZ.

All engineers do not produce the same solution. However, they do tend to copy once the working model is known.

Please forgive bad spelling, grammar and punctuations.

Regards,

Lawrence Nordell

Conveyor Dynamics, Inc.

www.conveyor-dynamics.com

Lawrence Nordell Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. website, email & phone contacts: www.conveyor-dynamics.com nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com phone: USA 360-671-2200 fax: USA 360-671-8450

Tripper Spillage

Erstellt am 15. Jun. 2004 - 09:18

James,

Based on some of the replies, I am not sure if your concern is loading points & chutes or mainly the section up the inclines & on the curve. If it is the latter, I have installed several full, non-contact skirt installations and have recently seen the proporitary plastic belt covers used for this same problem. Any permanent skirts become a problem for idler replacement, so swing-up ones may be necessary. Also have a good look at what caused the lead-in & tail-out 'dribbles'. There is often something which can be done to reduce these significantly (feeder starting, clamshell door opening, belt sequencing etc.). For the belt-lift problem VF drives which give slow starts and reduce/eliminate belt lift problems on startup but won't help if belt lifts off on normal running when flow stops (shouldn't normally happen). I realise the roll-back spillage can happen at any time - even with belt not lifting - so full length skirts & covers may be your best solution. Have a look at the light, relatively inexpensive plastic ones. When the lumps are large the lump rollback can also become a safety issue for people on the walkways.

DECTECAU

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 15. Jun. 2004 - 10:40

G'day Dale,

U are on my topic here. Can U pls send me some details of the skirts to my work?.

Am thinking of the same for the stacker boom conveyor - another issue with rollback - need to partially removable to suit belt splicing platterns.

Thanks

James

Re: Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 19. Jun. 2004 - 08:55

Dear Mr. James Morrish,

The proper radius at tripper zone is a critical issue. There are generally established practices.

1) If we use radius, as calculated for fixed conveyor zone, the radius and thereby the tripper length will be large. This is maximum tension and as if belt is empty only at curvature. As said before, this will lead longer tripper and hence expensive machine.

2) As the people want to economize tripper connected with stacker or stacker cum reclaimer machine, they design as per serial no. 1 but with 20% material load. This is just a compromise and it will work most of the time, because the worst situation which is being considered in serial no. 1 rarely happens (such as starting tension and belt is empty only at curvature, etc). This method is commonly used by reputed designer / manufacturer of the mobile machine, and so it is understood that it will rarely give trouble.

As far as belt lift is concerned, it is simply related to belt tension, belt mass kg/m, and earth’s gravity pull. So, only way to prevent this is to either reduce the tension or increase the mass (as we cannot do anything about earth’s gravity). So, I suggest you to investigate the reduction in belt tension and increase the belt mass.

Belt mass, is to be understood as the average minimum mass during its reasonable belt life. I suggest you to consider following possibilities, as a practical solution :

1) The material is rolling at the tripper. So, you have to reduce the inclination of tripper.

2) You have to choose new inclination and appropriate radius. The radius is to be decided considering redesigning of conveyor and drive system so that, you have the lesser tension. This you can just achieve by softer start and if need be opt for higher percentage of sag value of the belt. Here, redesigning of conveyor does not mean its replacement, but only the adjustment in certain items.

3) Based on the new profile line of the belt, you can weld bracket / pedestal on the existing tripper structure stringers, so that the belt carrying run is according to required profile. Thus, you are not wasting your existing tripper.

4) You can add a trailer of few meters length behind the present tripper as an extension of the tripper length, so that the existing tripper and the trailer fulfils the need of the revised profile of the carrying belt run.

Hope the above information will be of use to you.

Regards,

Ishwar G Mulani.

Author of Book : Engineering Science and Application Design for Belt Conveyors.

Advisor / Consultant for Bulk Material Handling System & Issues.

Email : parimul@pn2.vsnl.net.in

Tel.: 0091 (0)20 25882916

rekhawar
(not verified)

Spillage From Stacker Trippers

Erstellt am 29. Aug. 2004 - 12:11

Dear all,

This is an interesting discussion. We too face similar problem in the Mobile Trippers. The problem is more severe in case of Ore Pellets.

In case of inclined conveyors, we installed rubber cutains at an interval of 2 mtrs on the carrying side of the belt. The idea was that the pellets roling in reverse direction, will loss their energy by striking on the rubber curtain and do not come out of the belt by jumping.

This has worked partiallly.

The idea of continuos plastic skirt boards as suggested by Mr. dale, appears to be effective.

Can I get more information about it?

Regards

Spillage Problem

Erstellt am 29. Aug. 2004 - 05:29

Greetings,

I have but one thing to add to this wonderfull topic-

"Belt training idlers at every tenth troughing idler position."

This will make your belt behave!!!!!