Supplementary Air in Blow Tank

Posted in: , on 12. Jan. 2010 - 23:45

Supplementary Air in blow tank dense phase conveying

Hi everyone, i just have a general question regarding supply air to a dense phase, dry coal fly ash pneumatic conveying system i am currently trying to analyse and troubleshoot.

In all my [limited] previous experience, pneumatic conveying systems that use blow tanks have conveying/supplementary air injected shortly after the blowtank in the discharge line.

This current system however has no conveying or supplementary air, all the air for the system is directed through the blow tank itself.

Could someone with a bit more experience please tell me if this is at all common or if it is possible to achieve better performance directing the main conveying air into the pipe after the blow tank. Why would the designers run all the air through the blow tank???

the system has a 5" dia pipe over a distance of around 600 m

Thanks everyone

Fly Ash

Posted on 13. Jan. 2010 - 01:49

From what I remember as seasonal in a pulverised coal powerplant the ash is so light anyway it flows like water after is collected in the bag house and then removed so it is an easy product to convey.

The bottom ash was pumped to a vacuum filter for later disposal from what I remember.

You may need to pipeline pig the lines from the vessel outward to clean them.

When was the compressor last checked for efficiency or new?

leon

Re: Supplementary Air In Blow Tank

Posted on 13. Jan. 2010 - 02:43

yeah the problem is not the ability of the ash to be conveyed, it is as you say very easily fluidised.

With improvements in ESP efficiency and recieving higher ash coal more ash is required to be conveyed.

I was wondering why there would not be a main conveying air supply, and if implementing one could increase the capacity of the system.

Re: Supplementary Air In Blow Tank

Posted on 13. Jan. 2010 - 10:02

Dear seahill,

In the blow tank, the fly ash – air mixture is formed with an SLR that generates the designed pipe line pressure of the conveying system.

The tank outlet configuration in combination with the design pressure and tank air flow determines the SLR.

In general, more tank air mixes more fly ash.

This is the way, the SLR is regulated by diverting the total air flow between the tank and the by-pass, which is connected shortly after the blow tank.

The tank outlet configuration can also be arranged that the by-pass is closed or not necessary.

Whether your installation can be upgraded to a higher capacity, depends on how far it is underused at this moment and whether the design is already optimal.

A calculation of the existing design can indicate the possibility of improvement.

With the existing pipeline, there is a maximum conveying capacity, which cannot be exceeded.

To execute such a calculation, it is necessary to know the pipe line geometry, tank size, fly ash particle size, fly ash particle density, fly ash bulk density, air compressor displacement, present capacity at the reached pressure.

Your installation (5” – 600 m) could have a capacity of approx. 20 tons/hr at 2.5 bar.

Have a nice day

Teus

Teus

Re: Supplementary Air In Blow Tank

Posted on 23. Jan. 2010 - 03:51

seahill

A lot has to do with the product you want to handle and just how "optimized" you want the system to be.

The ability of the material to become "aerated" or 'fluidized" and more importantly, the ability of that material to retain it's "aeration" has a great deal to do whether or not air assists are needed along the convey line or if putting all the air into the tank will suffice.

I have experience and installed systems for some very nice Class A Geldart materials which are a mile in length with all the air put into the system at the beginning only.

I have recently done a system for a material which looks like a Class A material but acts like a "sieve" in that it has very poor aeration retention. The end result was a pressure tank line charger with air assists every 3' along the line.

Many systems which put all the air into the beginning work well BUT end up wasting energy and can very well be doing significant damage to the product and/or pipe line due to an excessive velocity profile.

On the other hand, fully optimizing and designing a dense phase system with air assists can get more expensive and turn into a nightmare if the product changes physical characteristics.

Re: Supplementary Air In Blow Tank

Posted on 25. Jan. 2010 - 10:25

Dear Seahill,

In all my also [limited] previous experience I found various types of blow vessels; from bottom discharge to top discharge, single, twin, double, series of vessels, with and without by-pass. The by-pass function to control the SLR (see Tues' reply) can also be executed directly at the blow tank itself with one nozzle delivering the conveying gas flow, and a second nozzle delivering the SLR control air. This is often done for single/twin vessel arrangements.

If you have a sketch of your vessel arrangement it should become clear.

Regards, Sven