Shaft design

Posted in: , on 23. Mar. 2007 - 13:05

Based on the given load condition,i have found solid diameter,deflection value.I need to convert this one in to hollow one ,Any suggestions?

Free body diagrtam

Beam having total length of 1700mm

In middle uniformly distributed load of 4597 N/m

Self weight is 335 N

udl starts from 50mm and ends with 1600 mm

Max.bending moment found 1655Nm

Max.twisting moment 2101 Nm

Thanks in advance

Prakash

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 24. Mar. 2007 - 12:30

Read an engineering textbook.

John Gateley johngateley@hotmail.com www.the-credible-bulk.com

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 24. Mar. 2007 - 01:17

Prakash, I can do this for you. Would you like my consultancy rates?

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 25. Mar. 2007 - 09:29

Dear Mr. Prakash,

You are referring to design of hollow shaft and right now you have designed it as solid shaft. If you want to design it as a hollow shaft, you have to take the values applicable to the hollow shaft and make the design. Shaft design procedure will not change whether it is a hollow shaft or solid shaft. While designing as a hollow shaft you will require the modulus of section and section moment of inertia as input. Use these values considering hollow shaft and you will get the size for the hollow shaft.

No one opts for a conversion factor for converting solid shaft diameter into hollow shaft diameters, etc.

Regards,

Ishwar G Mulani.

Author of Book : Engineering Science and Application Design for Belt Conveyors.

Author of Book : Belt Feeder Design and Hopper Bin Silo

Advisor / Consultant for Bulk Material Handling System & Issues.

Email : parimul@pn2.vsnl.net.in

Tel.: 0091 (0)20 25882916

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 25. Mar. 2007 - 02:50

Originally posted by johngateley

Grabber.

I'm a child of the '60's so ...

The best things in life are free

But you can keep them for the birds and bees

Now give me money

That's what I want

That's what I want, yeah

That's what I want


I'm also a child of a closed pension scheme so ...

You're lovin' gives me a thrill

But you're lovin' don't pay my bills

Now give me money

That's what I want

That's what I want, yeah

That's what I want


.... ;-)

Oh, and in preparation for my engineering exams (old fashioned 'sudden death' type) I read books, some I bought, some I borrowed from collegues, some on loan from libraries. No internet forums in those days!

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 24. Apr. 2007 - 04:52

Dear Mr. Prakash,

The most important thing in shaft design is the deflection

Rulmeca advises 1/3000 of the bearing length to be the deflection limit

if you calculate all the parameters of the shaft you will find that the deflection based calculations gives the most safe results

Waleed Mohammed Mechanical Design engineer

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 25. Apr. 2007 - 02:49

Deflection has no meaning by itself. Its an old wife's tale. If all pulley designs were of the same type, maybe. Since they are not, we resort to engineering the contact stress mechanics of locking devices to study fatigue limits which include the mean and alternating stress levels, stress on bolts, stress on hub, yield limits and plastic flow, and oscillating strain on bolts, et al.

Lawrence Nordell Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. website, email & phone contacts: www.conveyor-dynamics.com nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com phone: USA 360-671-2200 fax: USA 360-671-8450

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 25. Apr. 2007 - 02:56

No modern pulley designer would use a deflection criteria due to the complexity of analyzing for shaft to the hub and after the hub, hub contribution to stiffnes, locking device stiffness, end disk and shell stiffness contributions. Shaft deflection is no longer a simple beam analysis. Its use was primitive and like the dinosaur its day has passed.

Lawrence Nordell Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. website, email & phone contacts: www.conveyor-dynamics.com nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com phone: USA 360-671-2200 fax: USA 360-671-8450
Axel Witt
(not verified)

Re: Shaft Design

Posted on 26. Apr. 2007 - 10:33

Dear Mr. Nordell,

I agree with you 100%.

Best regards,